[Indicfonts] Samyak successfully harmonizes different Indic scripts
rahul bhalerao
rahul_pb_india@antispam.org
Sun Dec 25 14:28:09 IST 2005
Primoz PETERLIN <primoz.peterlin at biofiz.mf.uni-lj.si> wrote:
>I believe Samyak has so far come closest to the ideal of being a true
>pan-Indic font, i.e. one that successfully harmonizes different Indic
>scripts, making them of proportional height and weight.
First of all, THANKS for that appriciation. We actually started with the same intention to harmonize these scripts. And its great to hear that we have done it
successfully.
>I understand that while Samyak Sans is a compendium of other free OpenType
>Indic fonts, Samyak ("Serif", i.e. with modulated stroke) is your own
>creation. Am I right?
Yes. Sans are based on other free fonts(did't want to waste time in something
available already). But Samyak i.e. serif is completely our own creation.
> I suppose another requirement is that the Shirorekha aligns in Devanagari, >Bengali and Gurmukhi, and there are probabyl many more such rules.
Certainly we acknowledge that there is still lot to go ahead. Requirements are
huge and we shall make sure to come closer to satisfy them.
>I noticed that the Samyak SFD files use quadratic splines rather than
>cubic ones. Does that mean that you indeed design glyphs that way, i.e.
>with quadratic splines? I prefer to work with cubic splines - I find it
>much easier to have a better control over a fewer control points.
Even I find it easier to work with cubic splines and less number of control points.
And we indeed started working with cubic splines. Most of our work was done
with cubics only. But we faced some problems with them. While generating .ttf
from them fontforge intrpolates and convert them to quadratic splines and while
doing this the control points are increased automatically. Again cubic splines are still not supported on many machines and give problems while installation.
Also while drawing with cubic splines curve points occassionally get converted to
corner pionts(when you try to stretch the curves). The shape may appear smooth
in one view but sometimes after scaling, these curves don't appear as smooth as
intended. As a developer we stressed on using as less control points as
possible. But the font generation algorithm of fontforge sometimes add extra
points. We couldn't find a good solution for this. If you know the best method,
please let us know.
>Thanks also for the technical details about merging fonts with anchor classes in >FontForge(http://www.gnowledge.org/Gnoware/localization/merge.htm). I've had
>problems with these, since I was not aware that the anchor class *had* to
>be defined in advance in the target font. I would like to mention though
>that point 6 (Copy-Paste) can be replaced with the function Element ->
>Merge Fonts.
You may be right on using Element -> Merge Fonts function. But still this point
has some relation with point 7. Just to make sure nothing is lost we preferred this
way. Anyway you just have to select the entire block of glyphs from one file and
paste into the target file. All the typographic rules associated with them also get
copied. So it works!
>Maybe I should start with introducing myself. Some years ago, I have started >the Free UCS outline font project, . The project aim is to provide a set of free >OpenType fonts, which should eventually span throughout the most used parts >of Unicode.
>I any case, as a member of the Free UCS outline fonts project, I am
>looking forward to borrowing from your work, and of course hope you will
>do the same if needed.
It's really great to get such response from someone like you.
Thanks once more!
Regards,
Rahul Bhalerao,
[Indic Fonts Team,
HBCSE,TIFR.]
---------------------------------
Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://gnowledge.org/pipermail/indicfonts/attachments/20051225/7fcabbf0/attachment.htm
More information about the Indicfonts
mailing list